Distributed Membership System
#01 HungerGames song

GooGle has today launched a new platform that aims to reinvent how content creators on the Internet make money. It’s called Google Contributor, and it involves readers committing to a certain monthly payment of $1-3, which will in turn give visitors an ad-free browsing experience on some sites... This contribution only happens when you actually visit websites, so the cut of your monthly contribution level will get split up depending on which sites you visit most often. (Business Models For Information)


  • April article on changes to program - now millions of publisher sites?

  • July article by Chris Kane.

  • options are now $2/5/10 per month. At $2/month "a typical person will see 5-15% fewer ads" - is that across your whole experience, or across AdSense sites, or Contributor partners, or what?

  • you have to turn on Personalized Ads
  • as a Publisher/Creator you have to be using AdSense, Ad Exchange, or Double Click for Publishers (DFP).

z2014-11-21- Google Contributor
#01 PayPal-Me - launched, and started using here - see lower right of FrontPage
Front Page
Wiki Ebook
#01 ThinBook trunk

#03 cf PublishThenFilterThe nPackage
EdTech ERP
Scientific Method
Peer Review
cf ScientificMethod

Scott Hotchkiss wonders whether Annotation Systems could function as Peer Review.

I think the isolated scientific paper is a product of the 20th century, being imposed on the 21st purely because of inertia. A better solution would be to give a "living paper" to each general research project an individual researcher has. This living paper can then be updated as results change/improve. In such a system I would probably have ~5 living papers so far in my career, instead of ~20 old-style papers. Or, even better, would be a large WiKi edited, annotated, moderated and discussed by the science community as knowledge is gained. (cf Wiki Ebook)

Even if you to wish to keep "the paper" as how science is presented, I think that the journal system, while invaluable in the 20th century, also exists in the 21st century only due to inertia... Today, if a paper in your field is good, people talk about it. This gets discussed in emails amongst collaborators, which then disperses into departmental journal clubs and the information about the quality of the paper is disseminated like that. It's worth emphasising that, at least in high energy physics and cosmology, this often happens long before the paper is technically "published" via the slow, conventional Peer Review.

One way to achieve this would be to add comments/annotations to the arXiv. For various reasons, the people at arXiv are reluctant to do this... But this doesn't mean that the service isn't desired. And, now, in fact, something very near to this does exist. It is called Hypothes Is and it is a web annotation tool... For such a system to work would require a critical mass of people using it before it becomes effective. At present, an annotation is either visible to just the author, or to anyone. If annotations could be restricted to sub-groups then people will be more inclined to write annotations. Then, the particular annotations that the group (e.g. a research group at a university) finds most useful can be made more publicly available, if desired. Also, the ability to be notified (e.g. via email) whenever annotations are written on specific webpages, or websites would be needed. At present I can only see the option to be notified when someone replies to my own annotation. This means that if an annotation is written on a paper at the arXiv, then nobody else knows until someone specifically chooses to look at that paper, meaning most annotations will lie unread for a long time; a time unbounded from above.

z2015-08-26- Hotchkiss Annotations As Peer Review
Automatic Media
Syncopated Music
contrapuntal jazz piano
My Product Development Process
categorizing inputs by PersonA to ease brain overload
Disputation Arena
focus on EPrime, ArgumentationVisuali zation, and a WebOfTrust?
Biggest OpenSource projects
Golden Age
Global Warming
Geo Engineering
Debate Graph
Argumentation Visualization

My Intro Blurb:

This is the publicly-readable WikiLog Thinking Space of Bill Seitz (a Product Manager and CTO).

My Calling: to accelerate Evolut Ion by increasing FreeDom and Opportunity and AgenCy for many people via DAndD of Thinking Tools (software and Games To Play) that increase the LeverAge of Free Agent-s and smaller groups (Small World).

See Intro Page for space-related goals, status, etc.; or WikiNode for more terse summary info.

Beware the War On The Net!


Seeking: Product Manager-type position in established organization with entrepreneurial culture, local to Barrington Il or remote. My value: accelerating business-changing product development.



My Recent Key Pages:
My Blog Roll:
Follow me on Twitter

My Tip Jar